So, the aftermath of
Scratch that. They’re gunning for gun OWNERS.
Sure they are calling for the ban of various firearms, whether their definitions of what is or is not an “assault rifle” are accurate. But the real target is on the gun owners themselves. How do I know this? Because liberals have demonstrated time and time again that they are about identifying people by groups, and subsequently subjecting that targeted group with burdensome regulations, fines, threats of imprisonment or revocation of tax-exempt status, etc.
I reiterate: name one gun on death row. (Two-edged sword, isn’t it?)
The draconian measures in Sen. Di-Fi’s gun grab bill include provisions like large licensing fees (the owner pays this – not the gun), tracking the life of the gun (which is an inanimate object, but is now somehow personified), confiscation of said gun upon the owner’s death (no passing on to offspring), and a plentitude of regulations on the purchase of ammo.
Blah, blah, blah. Now, let’s look at a sacrosanct issue for libs: elective abortion.
When the Supremes decided that abortion was somehow found in the shadow of the penumbra of the right to privacy (supposedly in the Constitution), that began the greatest wanton slaughter of the innocent unborn in the history of the Republic. And it continues today.
In 2011-2012, Planned Parenthood received $542 million in tax-payer funds (http://www.examiner.com/article/nearly-one-half-of-planned-parenthood-income-is-from-tax-dollars). In this same time frame, abortions constituted 92% of their pregnancy “services.”
But this culture of death on the left isn’t satisfied with merely the Championship Trophy of Roe v. Wade. Nope. They’ve actively been stalwart opponents of any legislation that might somehow impede this bloodshed.
When then President Clinton was confronted with possible legislation that would curb partial-birth abortion, he flatly stated that he would not support legislation that would even infringe on a woman and doctor’s right to kill a baby trying to exit a birth canal.
“Where do we go from here? There’s nothing more than that, is there?” asked the pro-life movement. Enter Barrack Hussein Obama.
Obama’s war on (unborn) women began early in his political career in the state of
In Constitutional parlance, it would be said, “… the right to kill your unborn shall not be infringed.”
Thus, I am here to offer a compromise. I'll trade ya.
I will allow the Federal Government to register not only our guns, but
The Federal Government will also register the name, SS number, address, last known whereabouts and biometric identifiers (fingerprints, iris scans,
I feel that this is fair and equal treatment under the law… except for one thing:
After MY transaction, all involved parties go home alive.
-Reido






